This according to delegates of the People’s International Observers’ Mission (PIOM) who were here to observe the May 10 elections.
The group said the Commission on Elections, Smartmatic and the Arroyo government were accountable for the problems encountered.
“And we can fairly say that the Philippine government is not committed to free and honest elections,” it added.
That in itself is an understatement.
I wonder if there has ever been a Philippine government committed to free and honest elections.
From the way the last elections were held the answer would be no.
I'm not going to bother with the details so I will post verbatim the observations of PIOM as posted by the Inquirer in their website.
The group said the Commission on Elections, Smartmatic and the Arroyo government were accountable for the problems encountered.
“And we can fairly say that the Philippine government is not committed to free and honest elections,” it added.
That in itself is an understatement.
I wonder if there has ever been a Philippine government committed to free and honest elections.
From the way the last elections were held the answer would be no.
I'm not going to bother with the details so I will post verbatim the observations of PIOM as posted by the Inquirer in their website.
- There was a sore lack in the preparations such as lack of teachers and lack of technicians; too few precinct count optical scan machines; no back-up plans, among other thing;
- There was general chaos and confusion in the voting process such as overcrowding due to the clustered precincts and there was no uniformity in procedures;
- There was lack of secrecy in the voting process such as people in the precincts watching, taking pictures of voters and people seen outside the polling places dictating to voters whom to vote for;
- There were clear violations of laws on campaigning such as poll watchers wearing campaign T-shirts and bringing campaign paraphernalia inside the precincts;
- Vote-buying was prevalent as shown by people lining up in politicians’ houses, people being paid not to vote and people distributing campaign materials with money clipped in;
- There was election-related violence such as cases of intimidation and harassment coming from armed groups of candidates, landlords and the military. It cited the case of Abra which was a "ghost town the night of the elections;"
- The heavy presence of military and police in the communities and within the polling places contributed to or caused a climate of fear;
- Political dynasties and their armed militias still lord it over local politics;
- There was a systematic vilification campaign against leftist senatorial candidates Satur Ocampo, Liza Maza and eight progressive partylist groups; and
- Political and economic inequality creates vulnerability to intimidation and vote buying.
The group concluded that widespread intimidation, vote-buying, corruption and violence showed that automation "could solve only part of the problem.’’
Of course we will counter this and say that they are wrong but the thing is we are looking at it from our respective subjective eyes.
The international observers are looking at it as outsiders - as objective 3rd parties. I think I will believe the objective party more than the subjective.
Besides I'm tired of "our" excuses anyway. They are pretty much the same.
The bright side is that this election was way better than previous ones. And there is still room for improvement.
Hopefully the coming elections will prove that point.
Of course we will counter this and say that they are wrong but the thing is we are looking at it from our respective subjective eyes.
The international observers are looking at it as outsiders - as objective 3rd parties. I think I will believe the objective party more than the subjective.
Besides I'm tired of "our" excuses anyway. They are pretty much the same.
The bright side is that this election was way better than previous ones. And there is still room for improvement.
Hopefully the coming elections will prove that point.
No comments:
Post a Comment